The job of this console
Open your packet, write against goals, submit. Managers complete team packets. HR watches the cycle.
Talent · Reviews
Performance Reviews
Write-ups on Employee for a cycle — ratings and narrative, masked, not the compensation award itself.
Scroll to Flowcharts. Scenario: Complete a performance review.
The write-up
Ratings on the person, pay on payroll
Performance reviews are the cycle write-up on Employee. They are not salary structures and not a public feed.
Performance → Performance reviews
Route
/performance/reviews
Org flag reviewsEnabled
Employee · Manager · HR
Seat at the table
Employees, managers, HR as the cycle defines. Executives may see calibration, not every narrative.
The working rhythm
Open, write, submit, wait for calibration if any.
Moments that bring you here
Self-review due. Manager write-up. After 1:1s. Before calibration.
ⓘ
Sensitive talent data
Do not persist raw reviews in Work Graph or AI audit. Compensation is a separate step.
Flowcharts
1 — Write then submit
Open the cycle review, write, submit, optionally calibrate.
flowchart TD
A[Open Reviews] --> B[Open your packet]
B --> C[Write]
C --> D[Submit]
D --> E[Calibration if used]
E --> F[Compensation later]
- 1OpenPerformance → Performance reviews.
- 2PacketCycle + person.
- 3SubmitWorkflow.
- 4NextCalibration / compensation.
Overview
Reviews are talent records on Employee. Goals feed them. Calibration may adjust. Compensation is payroll.
How to use
1. Mask narrative
No medical/pay dumps in AI.
2. Goals first
Empty goals make thin reviews.
3. Not a PIP tracker unless modelled
Growth plans may follow.